🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."